Most views on this blog are the opinions of one person—me, mainly—unless I’m posting poll results.
]]>It’s definitely not in the same category as Terms of Endearment and Broadcast News, though. I own both those movies and they still hold up under repeated viewings.
]]>I don’t have any intention of seeing it; the trailer was so underwhelming. If Apatow was truly aiming for Brooksian heights, he might have considered casting leads other than Adam Sandler and Seth Rogen. I mean, Terms of Endearment had Shirley MacLaine, Debra Winger and Jack Nicholson. And I agree that more length doesn’t necessarily equal better or more serious. More tedious, maybe.
]]>The L.A. Times’ Patrick Goldstein had a great column about this movie a few weeks back where he gave Apatow shit for equating running time with seriousness. I’m totally paraphrasing, but he was like, long movies aren’t better dude, they’re just longer. You don’t need to get all epic to make a good dramedy!
And, personally, I think that if you’re aiming to make your first “James L. Brooks” movie (as Apatow has declared a few times recently) you should aim for “Terms of Endearment” and not “Spanglish”. Yikes…
]]>Can’t wait….
]]>Ardent Adam Sandler fans will like it.
]]>