It’s always the books that count though. And I expect Stevens and Dunn would both be devestated if anything detracted from their written works.
]]>p.s., each of the backgrounds could well be true, though.
]]>I’m aware of one person who is promoting a book she hasn’t written yet (which I always find hilarious — if these slick little self-promoters spent half the time WRITING the book as they do “building their internet presence”, they’d be published already, lol) and her backstory already has huge holes in it. Huge, verifiable holes. So now, if she ever does get that book published, fuggeddabouddit. It’s over before it began with that one.
So it’s a fine line — what to reveal, who will it impact besides yourself, is it a brutally honest bio or a glossed over, semi-fictionalized bio, etc. Can you cultivate too much familiarity? Familiarity often breeds contempt. And, even if you do have a fascinating, legitimate inside track to something, you can still tell a horribly boring story about it.
That said…I am so totally buying The Informationist because of the author background!
]]>