Today I’m discussing The Adventures of Tintin with my regular contributor Eric Edwards. This is partly because I wanted someone else to do half the work, but also because I thought another point of view from someone who’s less a rabid fan of Hergé’s work would be valuable. Since Eric attends many of the industry screenings I do, he was the perfect victim.

Tintin, directed by Steven Spielberg, is based on the popular-in-Europe series of comic books about the intrepid boy reporter and his trusty canine companion, Snowy. The movie borrows plot points from a few of the books so a lot happens, but it boils down to Tintin (voiced by Jamie Bell) meeting Captain Haddock (Andy  Serkis), and their chasing an archenemy (Daniel Craig) and buried treasure across different countries via boat, plane, and motorbike.

Pop Culture Nerd: I thought this was well made in many ways but it feels like a kids’ movie because the humor is broad and the characters are caricatures. Ironically, Tintin seems more three-dimensional in the books to me, whereas he’s kind of bland here.

Eric Edwards: The books were pretty flat to me, but Hergé always managed to work in a little bit of wit that was missing here. For example, Snowy had thought bubbles in the books and his banter with other animals was hilarious.

PCN: That’s a good point. Snowy’s personality is much sharper on paper because we can tell what he’s thinking. He’s feisty and funny.

EE: In the movie, he’s really only allowed to be cute.

PCN: Spielberg said in this L.A. Times article that Snowy was the reason he decided not to do this in live action: “There was too much demanded from the dog and the risk was too high to go with dog trainers and several look-a-like dogs.” I wish he’d talked to the person who trained Uggie for The Artist and then tried the live-action route.

EE: Yeah! Uggie could do lots of stuff!

PCN: Snowy issues aside, what’d you think of this movie overall?

EE: I found it underwhelming because I need to relate to the protagonist, but Tintin’s too much of a Boy Scout and everyone else is an oaf and the villain is just evil. Some of the chase scenes were pretty cool, though.

PCN: Yeah, especially the sequence when they’re chasing that bird in the motorcycle and sidecar. That was wow-inducing and justified seeing the movie in 3D. The motion capture has come a long way…

EE: Their eyes are much more alive.

PCN: Yes. No more creepy Polar Expressions. The animation is really well done. Some of the vistas are gorgeous.

EE: It was so real that it became unreal, because it’s almost too perfect. Like in the desert, I don’t know if you can find sand that clean and pure.

PCN: Let’s talk about the score.

EE: It didn’t stand out for me.

PCN: It was a lesser imitation of the Raiders theme in some parts. I noticed similar notes and rhythms. John Williams went for rousing but didn’t quite get there.

EE: Speaking of Raiders, I don’t understand why people are comparing this to that. I don’t think it’s worthy in any shape or form.

PCN: I think it’s apples and coconuts. Raiders was for adults. It had Nazis, romance, violence (remember propeller guy?), mysticism, melting faces. This movie, while respecting the source material and being fairly faithful, seems more directed at kids. Adults can still enjoy it, but I hope they check out the books afterward, for themselves and their children.

Nerd verdicts: PCN—Tintin more 3D on paper, EE—Tintin isn’t gold.

Art: WETA Digital Ltd.


You Might Also Like...


  • Reply
    December 15, 2011 at 9:29 am

    OHHHH Elyse…so sorry this didn’t live up to your expectations…I know what the Tintin book series meant to you..

    • Reply
      December 15, 2011 at 9:35 am

      Oh, me too! I am disappointed because I wanted this to be as magical as the books!

      • Reply
        Pop Culture Nerd
        December 15, 2011 at 2:23 pm

        My expectation was simply to be entertained, as it is with all movies. This is a different medium so I didn’t expect to feel the same way about the movie as I do about the books, so I can’t say I’m disappointed exactly. It’s not a bad movie, just not…amazing.

        • Reply
          December 16, 2011 at 7:22 pm

          Ok…..I will go see it and wear my Tintin watch!

          • Reply
            Pop Culture Nerd
            December 17, 2011 at 10:11 am

            I’ve yet to see this watch!

            • Reply
              December 22, 2011 at 9:54 am

              This technidiot cannot figure out how to add a pic here….I will email one to you as I KNOW this must be keeping you up at night

  • Reply
    December 15, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    While in the lobby of a theater waiting for my movie to begin, I noticed parents exiting a screening the Muppets. Every kid that came out of the movie theater oooh-ed and awww-ed over a huge display of The Adventures of Tintin. It was really surprising because the display was one of those teasers just showing the characters, but not saying what the movie was called. The kids certainly knew. Since I knew the Tintin books, I figured the kids were familiar with them as well so I asked a couple of parents about their children’s reaction. They claimed the kids were only aware of the ads for movie, not the books. Some marketing campaign. One of my nephews may drag me to it, but I think I won’t be checking it out on my own.

    • Reply
      Pop Culture Nerd
      December 15, 2011 at 2:31 pm

      I saw that in theaters, too—kids yelling out “Tintin!” Regardless of my feelings for the movie, it makes me happy that Tintin’s finally getting some name recognition in America. As of a couple weeks ago when I mentioned this movie to people, they were still asking, “Are you talking about the dog Rin Tin Tin?”

  • Reply
    jenn aka the picky girl
    December 15, 2011 at 9:21 pm

    When I first heard about this, I was pretty excited…it may have been from you, actually. I haven’t read the books, but I’ve known they were pretty popular. I will still see this but am glad to know what to expect. And duh? Daniel Craig? Didn’t we have a convo about your message: Picky Girl, go see this. Even if it’s just his voice. 😉

    • Reply
      Pop Culture Nerd
      December 17, 2011 at 10:07 am

      Oh, yeah, my bad. I should’ve alerted you to the fact his voice is featured here. It’s very recognizable and he does a good job.

  • Reply
    Shell Sherree
    December 16, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    I think I’ll go along more to see the craftsmanship of the motion capture ~ it fascinates me! But I’m glad to hear the creepy expressions aren’t there. I hadn’t seen The Polar Express but caught a glimpse when flicking channels the other night and it unnerved me! I always enjoy yours and Eric’s joint reviews/animated discussions ~ thanks again.

    • Reply
      Pop Culture Nerd
      December 17, 2011 at 10:11 am

      The eyes are still not quite human-like but they’ve gotten a lot more realistic. I think the art of this movie is impressive, so as an artist, you can probably appreciate and get even more out of it than a layman like me.

Leave a Reply to EIREGO Cancel Reply